Cookie consent

This website uses cookies to collect information about how you use this website. Atkin Chambers uses this information to make the website work as well as possible and improve the services provided by members and staff. You may choose to accept all cookies or chose to manage your cookie settings here:

Cookies on atkinchambers.com

Cookies are files saved on your phone, tablet or computer when you visit a website.

Atkin Chambers uses this information to make the website work as well as possible and improve the services provided by members and staff. You may choose to accept all cookies or chose to manage your cookie settings here:

Cookie settings

Atkin Chambers Limited use two types of cookie files, analytical cookies and necessary cookies. You can choose which cookies you are happy for us to use.

Analytical cookies that measure website use

Atkin Chambers Limited use Google Analytics to measure how you use the website so it can be improved based on user needs. Atkin Chambers do not allow Google to use or share the data about how you use this site.

Google Analytics sets cookies that store anonymised information about:

  • how you got to the site
  • the pages you visit on atkinchambers.com, and how long you spend on each page
  • what you click on while you’re visiting the site

Strictly necessary cookies

These essential cookies do things like remember your progress through a form (for example if you register for updates). They always need to be on.

Save changes

University of Brighton v Dovehouse Interiors Ltd [2014] EWHC 940 (TCC)

4th Apr 2014

University of Brighton v Dovehouse Interiors Ltd [2014] BLR 432, 153 Con LR 147, [2014] EWHC 940 (TCC)

Defence of an application for declaratory relief as to the effect of a conclusive evidence clause in the JCT Standard Form.

The Court decided that adjudication proceedings were “commenced” upon service of a Notice of Adjudication pursuant to paragraph 1 of the Scheme, and not upon the issue of a Referral Notice under paragraph 7 thereof.

It held that the invalidity of a subsequent Referral Notice did not invalidate that Notice of Adjudication so as to entail that the adjudication proceedings had not been commenced for the purpose of a “conclusive evidence” clause.

Favourable declarations obtained.

(Instructed by Thomas Eggar LLP)

Related barristers: Serena Cheng

To read the full judgment please click here.

4 April 2014





Register for updates

To keep in touch with news and updates from Atkin Chambers:

 

Register