This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Please click here for more information

"Her preparation was immaculate and her presentation was brilliant."
Chambers and Partners

Serena Cheng QC

Serena is a commercial litigation and arbitration specialist whose practice focuses on technically and legally complex energy, engineering and infrastructure disputes. She is an experienced trial advocate who has represented a wide range of employers and contractors both domestically and internationally, with a particular emphasis on the Middle East.

A tenacious cross-examiner whose pleadings are excellent.” “She is diligent, efficient and innovative in her approach to complex issues.” (Chambers and Partners 2017)

She demonstrates excellent legal interpretation and is commercially savvy”. (Legal 500, 2016)

Sources consistently praise her for “being hard-working and technically excellent“; “Her preparation was immaculate and her presentation was brilliant.” (Chambers and Partners, 2015)

ENERGY AND UTILITIES Open concertina Open concertina

Oil and Gas

  • Counsel for the market-leading provider of deep-water drilling services in an LCIA arbitration concerning the operator’s wrongful termination of a contract for the provision of a semisubmersible rig for exploration off Libya (US$87 million);
  • Counsel for the main contractor under an EPCC contract for the first commercial production facility to be built in Iraq since the Gulf War. Document-heavy and detailed final account and delay dispute with the main sub-contractor under the LCIA Arbitration Rules;

Natural Energy

  • Counsel for the main contractor in three-party Commercial Court proceedings arising out of the exploration of the largest wind zone offshore the UK. Technically, legally and tactically complex case concerning the cause of, and liability for, the failure of a monopile and delay to the project.
  • Counsel for the employer on its appeal from an Arbitrator’s award in relation to the design and construction of a wind-farm in Scotland. The contractor disputed the Courts’ jurisdiction to hear the claim and the applicability of the Arbitration Act 1996 to arbitration with a Scottish seat.

Power and Utilities

  • Power Station: counsel for the bond-provider in its application for an injunction to restrain calls on two performance bonds ($40 million) given in support of its manufacture and supply of two 360MW boilers for installation at Pecem Power Station, Brazil;
  • Power Station: counsel for the joint-venture purchaser in its highly technical claim for damages for breach of the asset warranties contained in a share purchase agreement concerning the largest combined cycle gas turbine power station in Europe. The JV claimed damages of £121 million. The case was listed for 11 weeks and was one of The Lawyer’s “Top 20 cases of 2013”.
  • Electricity: counsel for the Master Developer in 2 conjoined DIAC arbitrations concerning the incidence of liability to pay for electrical connections to sub-developments in a Dubai free zone.
  • Waste-water treatment plant: counsel to the utilities provider in proposed TCC proceedings against six defendants concerning the design and construction of the nitrifying trickling filters at wastewater treatment plants across the north of England.
  • Culverts: counsel for the sub-contractor in a DIAC arbitration concerning its entitlement to repayment of bond monies (AED 33 million) called in relation to the construction of the service culverts supporting a development intended to be 50% larger than the Palm Jumeriah, Dubai and the contractor’s counterclaim for damages (AED 173.3). Involved detailed submissions on the UAE law governing an arbitrator’s jurisdiction.

ENGINEERING AND INFRASTRUCTURE Open concertina Open concertina

  • Low density polyethylene plant: counsel to the EPC contractor on claims arising out of the termination of EPC contracts concerning 2 world-scale LDP plants and the employer’s call on bonds and guarantees given in relation thereto.
  • Infrastructure: counsel for the statutory undertaker in arbitral proceedings and cross-proceedings concerning the contractor’s entitlement to a price adjustment and the value of the Employer’s Final Account under a framework agreement for the installation of new service connections throughout the Greater London area;
  • PFI Hospital: acting for an NHS Trust in adjudications concerning the legal basis of the contractor’s entitlement to extensions of time and to payment for variations under a PFI contract.
  • Mixed-use development: counsel for the employer in a DCCI arbitration concerning the basis of its entitlement to terminate a FIDIC contract for the construction of a mixed-use development in Dubai, and of the contractor’s entitlement to extensions of time and delay and disruption costs thereunder;
  • Mixed-use development: leading counsel for the contractor in a CRCICA arbitration concerning the contractor’s entitlement to extensions of time and loss and expense in relation to the concrete, architectural and electromechanical packages of a 750,000 m2 integrated urban development in Egypt;
  • Historic structures: counsel for the employer in a 6-week final account arbitration concerning the renovation of an historic conservatory, pavilions and park in Liverpool.

TRANSPORT Open concertina Open concertina

  • Airports: counsel for the structural steelworks sub-contractor in a 2-week DIAC arbitration concerning the construction and connection design of the structural steel rack of the Cargo Mega Terminal at Dubai International Airport. The case involved detailed submissions on UAE law.
  • Airports: Counsel for the employer in a DIAC arbitration concerning the expansion of an international airport under the Dubai Aviation City Corporation’s Standard Conditions of Contract. The joint-venture Contractor claimed payment of AED 3.8 billion in respect of remeasurement, variations, cost-escalation, mark-up on nominated sub-contract packages and prolongation, plus loss of revenue and damages for late payment;
  • Rail: Counsel for the rail network in an adjudication concerning the effect of inconsistent clauses in a complex contract for the extension of the London Overground (underlying claim £10 million);
  • Rail: counsel for the main contractor in tri-partite TCC proceedings concerning the design and design review of a rail maintenance depot. The case raised issues of geotechnical engineering, rail logistics, programming and the quantification of future losses.
  • Road: counsel in two large road-building arbitrations concerning the foreseeability of site conditions, the identification and valuation of variations and the Contractor’s entitlement to extensions of time and delay and disruption costs;
  • Harbour: advising the employer in relation to the design and construction of a harbour in the UK.

IT AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS Open concertina Open concertina

  • Counsel for the master systems integrator in an ICC arbitration concerning a Government’s wrongful termination of a contract for the design, procurement, installation, integration and commissioning of an airport IT system, network and security systems at an international airport in the Middle East.
  • Adjudication proceedings concerning the installation of a trans-European system of fibre-optic cables.
  • Court proceedings concerning billing errors under a 3-year mobile-phone air-time on-selling agreement.

PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE  Open concertina Open concertina

  • Counsel for the third-party designer in proceedings concerning the design and construction of a print-works in Sheffield. Listed for 4 weeks in the TCC in London.
  • Acting for the engineer in a claim arising out of its design of a methane gas extraction and processing plant.
  • Advising the employer on the liabilities of the contractor, engineer and architect involved in revetment works along the Medway River.