Cookie consent

This website uses cookies to collect information about how you use this website. Atkin Chambers uses this information to make the website work as well as possible and improve the services provided by members and staff. You may choose to accept all cookies or chose to manage your cookie settings here:

Cookies on atkinchambers.com

Cookies are files saved on your phone, tablet or computer when you visit a website.

Atkin Chambers uses this information to make the website work as well as possible and improve the services provided by members and staff. You may choose to accept all cookies or chose to manage your cookie settings here:

Cookie settings

Atkin Chambers Limited use two types of cookie files, analytical cookies and necessary cookies. You can choose which cookies you are happy for us to use.

Analytical cookies that measure website use

Atkin Chambers Limited use Google Analytics to measure how you use the website so it can be improved based on user needs. Atkin Chambers do not allow Google to use or share the data about how you use this site.

Google Analytics sets cookies that store anonymised information about:

  • how you got to the site
  • the pages you visit on atkinchambers.com, and how long you spend on each page
  • what you click on while you’re visiting the site

Strictly necessary cookies

These essential cookies do things like remember your progress through a form (for example if you register for updates). They always need to be on.

Save changes

Steven Walker QC success in the Court of Appeal

24th May 2017

Sutton Housing Partnership Limited and Rydon Maintenance Limited  [2017] EWCA Civ 359

Steven Walker QC appeared for the Appellant, Sutton Housing Partnership Limited, in an appeal from the Technology and Construction Court concerning the proper construction of the termination provisions in a five-year contract for the provision of repair and maintenance services.

Sutton terminated the contract for poor performance based on the contractor’s failure to achieve minimum acceptable performance levels (MAP levels).

The contractor (Rydon Maintenance Limited) argued that the contract did not specify any such MAP levels and therefore the termination was unlawful. The contractor successfully brought a claim for damages for wrongful termination in adjudication.

Sutton sought declarations under CPR Part 8 in order to challenge the outcome in the adjudication. The judge at first instance agreed with the adjudicator that the contract did not contain MAP levels. Sutton successfully appealed. Jackson LJ said the judge had been correct to say that the court should proceed with care when determining whether contractual provisions are sufficiently clear to permit the termination of a relatively long-term contract.

In allowing the appeal, the Court of Appeal focused on the consequences of the contractor’s interpretation which were that the contractor would not receive performance-related bonuses and Sutton would not be able to terminate for a failure to achieve MAP levels.

Jackson LJ concluded that Sutton’s construction was “the only rational interpretation of the curious contractual provisions into which the parties have entered”.

(Instructed by instructed by SA Law LLP)

Related barristers: Steven Walker QC

To view the full judgment please click here.

18 May 2017





Register for updates

To keep in touch with news and updates from Atkin Chambers:

 

Register