Cookie consent

This website uses cookies to collect information about how you use this website. Atkin Chambers uses this information to make the website work as well as possible and improve the services provided by members and staff. You may choose to accept all cookies or chose to manage your cookie settings here:

Cookies on atkinchambers.com

Cookies are files saved on your phone, tablet or computer when you visit a website.

Atkin Chambers uses this information to make the website work as well as possible and improve the services provided by members and staff. You may choose to accept all cookies or chose to manage your cookie settings here:

Cookie settings

Atkin Chambers Limited use two types of cookie files, analytical cookies and necessary cookies. You can choose which cookies you are happy for us to use.

Analytical cookies that measure website use

Atkin Chambers Limited use Google Analytics to measure how you use the website so it can be improved based on user needs. Atkin Chambers do not allow Google to use or share the data about how you use this site.

Google Analytics sets cookies that store anonymised information about:

  • how you got to the site
  • the pages you visit on atkinchambers.com, and how long you spend on each page
  • what you click on while you’re visiting the site

Strictly necessary cookies

These essential cookies do things like remember your progress through a form (for example if you register for updates). They always need to be on.

Save changes

Triple Point Technology, Inc v PTT Public Company Ltd [2018] EWHC 45 (TCC)

30th Jan 2018

Acting for PTT (Thai oil and petrochemicals major), the defendant, in claims and counterclaims in the London Technology and Construction Courtrelating to the termination of a professional services contract to design and implement an integrated commodities trading and vessel charterparty management system across its businesses in Asia and the Gulf.

In Triple Point Technology Inc v PTT Public Co Ltd [2017] EWHC 2178 (TCC) the claimant’s claim for unpaid invoices failed, and the defendant succeeded in recovering over $4 million on its counterclaim for negligence and breach of contract in the design of the system and project management.

The claimant – Triple Point Technology – was a company incorporated in the US which contracted with the defendant PTT, a Thai company, to provide it with a software system. The contract was subject to English law and to the jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales, but the currency of the contract was US dollars. The defendant terminated the contract amidst a dispute concerning delay.

In Triple Point Technology, Inc v PTT Public Company Ltd [2018] EWHC 45 (TCC) the court was required to determine issues concerning interest on damages and costs following the defendant’s successful counterclaim against the claimant.

The defendant had made a part 36 offer to settle on payment of $2 million from the claimant. The offer expired on 21 June 2016 without having been accepted. The defendant had, therefore, obtained a judgment substantially more advantageous than its offer. The court was required to determine the rate of interest on the defendant’s damages before and after the part 36 offer, the period of interest on damages, and the rate of interest on the defendant’s costs.

See judgments:

Instructed by Watson, Farley & Williams LLP for the Defendant.

Related barrister: James Howells QC.

To view the full judgment please click here.

17 January 2018





Related Sectors

Related Juristictions

Register for updates

To keep in touch with news and updates from Atkin Chambers:

 

Register