Cookie consent

This website uses cookies to collect information about how you use this website. Atkin Chambers uses this information to make the website work as well as possible and improve the services provided by members and staff. You may choose to accept all cookies or chose to manage your cookie settings here:

Cookies on atkinchambers.com

Cookies are files saved on your phone, tablet or computer when you visit a website.

Atkin Chambers uses this information to make the website work as well as possible and improve the services provided by members and staff. You may choose to accept all cookies or chose to manage your cookie settings here:

Cookie settings

Atkin Chambers Limited use two types of cookie files, analytical cookies and necessary cookies. You can choose which cookies you are happy for us to use.

Analytical cookies that measure website use

Atkin Chambers Limited use Google Analytics to measure how you use the website so it can be improved based on user needs. Atkin Chambers do not allow Google to use or share the data about how you use this site.

Google Analytics sets cookies that store anonymised information about:

  • how you got to the site
  • the pages you visit on atkinchambers.com, and how long you spend on each page
  • what you click on while you’re visiting the site

Strictly necessary cookies

These essential cookies do things like remember your progress through a form (for example if you register for updates). They always need to be on.

Save changes

Riaz Hussain QC successfully establishes that a party in liquidation can proceed with an adjudication

22nd Apr 2020

Riaz Hussain QC acted in the first reported case where a Party in liquidation succeeded in being allowed to proceed with an adjudication.

In Balfour Beatty Civil Engineering Ltd & Anor v Astec Projects Ltd [2020] EWHC 796 (TCC) (27 February 2020) Astec successfully established that it could provide adequate security and was allowed to conditionally proceed with an adjudication.

The Defendant established that the exceptional circumstances envisaged by the Court of Appeal in Bresco whereunder a Party in liquidation would not be injuncted from adjudicating were met. The claim for an injunction to prohibit the adjudication was dismissed. Waksman J noted that under Bresco a party in liquidation can only proceed with an adjudication in exceptional circumstances. However it was accepted that the exceptional criteria were met on the facts. The judgment also considers the requirements of rule 14.25 of the Insolvency Rules 2016 and in particular that the rule does not require the final net balance of the mutual dealings between the Parties to be determined in a single adjudication or proceedings.

Riaz Hussain QC and Chantelle Staynings (instructed by Gateley Plc) for the Defendant.

To read the full judgment please click here: Balfour Beatty Civil Engineering Ltd & Anor v Astec Projects Ltd [2020] EWHC 796 (TCC)

27 February 2020





Related Juristictions

Register for updates

To keep in touch with news and updates from Atkin Chambers:

 

Register