Cookie consent

This website uses cookies to collect information about how you use this website. Atkin Chambers uses this information to make the website work as well as possible and improve the services provided by members and staff. You may choose to accept all cookies or chose to manage your cookie settings here:

Cookies on atkinchambers.com

Cookies are files saved on your phone, tablet or computer when you visit a website.

Atkin Chambers uses this information to make the website work as well as possible and improve the services provided by members and staff. You may choose to accept all cookies or chose to manage your cookie settings here:

Cookie settings

Atkin Chambers Limited use two types of cookie files, analytical cookies and necessary cookies. You can choose which cookies you are happy for us to use.

Analytical cookies that measure website use

Atkin Chambers Limited use Google Analytics to measure how you use the website so it can be improved based on user needs. Atkin Chambers do not allow Google to use or share the data about how you use this site.

Google Analytics sets cookies that store anonymised information about:

  • how you got to the site
  • the pages you visit on atkinchambers.com, and how long you spend on each page
  • what you click on while you’re visiting the site

Strictly necessary cookies

These essential cookies do things like remember your progress through a form (for example if you register for updates). They always need to be on.

Save changes

Pupil Mathias Cheung awarded SCL Hudson Prize 2015

8th Feb 2016

Mathias Cheung has won the SCL Hudson Prize 2015 for his essay entitled ‘Shylock’s Construction Law: the Brave New Life of Liquidated Damages?’.

The paper comments on the recent Supreme Court decision of Cavendish Square Holding v Makdessi, which replaced the Dunlop test of ‘genuine pre-estimate of loss’ for penalty clauses with a new test of ‘legitimate interest’. It begins with a brief overview of the historical origins and development of the doctrine of penalties, both in equity and at common law, before addressing the new test laid down in the five judgments. The paper then goes on to analyse the impact of the new test on the use of liquidated damages clauses in the construction industry, expressing concerns as to the uncertainty and arbitrary value judgments surrounding the application of the new test.

1. A brief history of the doctrine of penalties – (i) Early roots from equity to common law – (ii)Dunlop and subsequent developments – (iii) Paving the path to Makdessi? – 2. The new test under Makdessi – 3. The purpose of LADs in construction contracts – 4. Potential problems with Makdessi – 5. The way forward.

The paper will be published in the Construction Law Journal in the autumn and is available to download online here.





Register for updates

To keep in touch with news and updates from Atkin Chambers:

 

Register