Cookie consent

This website uses cookies to collect information about how you use this website. Atkin Chambers uses this information to make the website work as well as possible and improve the services provided by members and staff. You may choose to accept all cookies or chose to manage your cookie settings here:

Cookies on atkinchambers.com

Cookies are files saved on your phone, tablet or computer when you visit a website.

Atkin Chambers uses this information to make the website work as well as possible and improve the services provided by members and staff. You may choose to accept all cookies or chose to manage your cookie settings here:

Cookie settings

Atkin Chambers Limited use two types of cookie files, analytical cookies and necessary cookies. You can choose which cookies you are happy for us to use.

Analytical cookies that measure website use

Atkin Chambers Limited use Google Analytics to measure how you use the website so it can be improved based on user needs. Atkin Chambers do not allow Google to use or share the data about how you use this site.

Google Analytics sets cookies that store anonymised information about:

  • how you got to the site
  • the pages you visit on atkinchambers.com, and how long you spend on each page
  • what you click on while you’re visiting the site

Strictly necessary cookies

These essential cookies do things like remember your progress through a form (for example if you register for updates). They always need to be on.

Save changes

Mischa Balen discusses the case of ParkingEye v Beavis for Construction News

3rd Dec 2015

In an article published on 30th November 2015 in Construction News Mischa Balen discusses the recent Supreme Court decision of ParkingEye v Beavis and explores how penalty clauses could have a big impact on construction contracts.

Media coverage of the Supreme Court’s recent decision on penalty clauses has focused largely on Barry Beavis, a 47-year-old chip shop owner from Chelmsford, and his battle with a car park operator to avoid a fine for overstaying his welcome at the Riverside Retail Park.

Readers may be forgiven for questioning the relevance of Mr Beavis’s car parking habits to the construction industry.

The Supreme Court’s judgment is important not just for consumers but also for construction professionals who routinely rely upon damages clauses in building contracts to recover damages for delay to a project’s completion date.

To read the full article, please visit the Construction News website.





Register for updates

To keep in touch with news and updates from Atkin Chambers:

 

Register