Application to enforce an adjudicator’s decision insofar as it related to the contractor’s debt recovery costs. The Court decided that although those costs had not been specifically referred to in its Notice of Adjudication, the adjudicator had jurisdiction to award the contractor those costs because they were connected with, and ancillary to, the dispute referred to him.
Decision successfully enforced.
To read the full judgment please click here.
Serena Cheng (instructed by Direct Access) appeared on behalf of the Claimant
17 March 2016
In this webinar, Mathias Cheung presents a round-up of the key cases and developments from the…
David Streatfeild-James KC and Mathias Cheung acted successfully for the Claimant in Mace Construct Ltd v…
For more information please contact our clerks on
+44 (0)20 7404 0102 or clerks@atkinchambers.com
