This is an appeal by a building contractor against a decision that there is no entitlement to interim payments in the period after the contractual date for practical completion.
The principal issues are (i) how some rather unusual amendments to the standard form building contract should be construed and (ii) how section 109 of the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 (“the 1996 Act”) applies in the circumstances of this case.
(Instructed by Pinsent Masons LLP)
Related barristers: Steven Walker QC and Camille Slow
To read the full judgment please click here
[2017] BLR 1, [2016] WLR(D) 522, 168 Con LR 1, [2016] EWCA Civ 990[2016] EWHC 168 (TCC); [2016] Bus LR 480
In this webinar, Mathias Cheung presents a round-up of the key cases and developments from the…
David Streatfeild-James KC and Mathias Cheung acted successfully for the Claimant in Mace Construct Ltd v…
For more information please contact our clerks on
+44 (0)20 7404 0102 or clerks@atkinchambers.com
