Cookie consent

This website uses cookies to collect information about how you use this website. Atkin Chambers uses this information to make the website work as well as possible and improve the services provided by members and staff. You may choose to accept all cookies or chose to manage your cookie settings here:

Cookies on atkinchambers.com

Cookies are files saved on your phone, tablet or computer when you visit a website.

Atkin Chambers uses this information to make the website work as well as possible and improve the services provided by members and staff. You may choose to accept all cookies or chose to manage your cookie settings here:

Cookie settings

Atkin Chambers Limited use two types of cookie files, analytical cookies and necessary cookies. You can choose which cookies you are happy for us to use.

Analytical cookies that measure website use

Atkin Chambers Limited use Google Analytics to measure how you use the website so it can be improved based on user needs. Atkin Chambers do not allow Google to use or share the data about how you use this site.

Google Analytics sets cookies that store anonymised information about:

  • how you got to the site
  • the pages you visit on atkinchambers.com, and how long you spend on each page
  • what you click on while you’re visiting the site

Strictly necessary cookies

These essential cookies do things like remember your progress through a form (for example if you register for updates). They always need to be on.

Save changes

Failure to estop: rationalising proprietary estoppel using failure of basis

1st Jan 2011

Proprietary estoppel is claimed to rest, variously, on unconscionability, or on the unjust enrichment of the party who makes the promise. Both of these approaches are problematic. Instead, and borrowing from the unjust enrichment concept of failure of basis, a cause of action in proprietary estoppel arises where A assures B that B has or will have a property right in A’s land, and B incurs detriment on the objective basis that A will fulfil his promise. Should A resile, the basis on which B incurred her detriment will fail, giving her a cause of action in proprietary estoppel. The quantum and mode of relief should be that which is necessary to remedy B’s detriment incurred on the failed basis.

Failure to estop: rationalising proprietary estoppel using failure of basis. Conveyancer & Property Lawyer, Sweet & Maxwell





Register for updates

To keep in touch with news and updates from Atkin Chambers:

 

Register