Defective Premises Law: Time For Remedial Works?

1st Jun 2011

David Johnson looks at the history and usefulness of the Defective Premises Act 1972, against the background of developments of the law of tort in particular in Murphy v Brentwood and subsequent cases. The Act offers a statutory claim for damages for defects in dwellings: the right of action requires neither a contractual link between claimant and defendant nor the need to show a duty of care in negligence between them in relation to ‘pure economic loss’. The paper considers the basis of liability and argues for two changes which would make the 1972 Act even more useful – clarifying the basis of liability and extending the present six year post-completion limitation period.

Introduction – The problem – Murphy: attempted solutions – The ‘complex structure’ theory – Establishing a ‘special relationship’ – Reactions to Murphy – Enter the Defective Premises Act – The content of the duty – What is a dwelling? – The standard of care required – Strict liability, but with a new defence? – The 1972 Act and limitation of actions – Conclusions.

Defective Premises Law: Time for Remedial Works? Const. L.J. 2012, 28(2), 132-143 © Sweet and Maxwell.

Subscribe Now

Sign up now to receive our latest news, legal insights and information on upcoming events.