This website uses cookies to collect information about how you use this website. Atkin Chambers uses this information to make the website work as well as possible and improve the services provided by members and staff. You may choose to accept all cookies or chose to manage your cookie settings here:
Cookies are files saved on your phone, tablet or computer when you visit a website.
Atkin Chambers uses this information to make the website work as well as possible and improve the services provided by members and staff. You may choose to accept all cookies or chose to manage your cookie settings here:
Cookie settings
Atkin Chambers Limited use two types of cookie files, analytical cookies and necessary cookies. You can choose which cookies you are happy for us to use.
Analytical cookies that measure website use
Atkin Chambers Limited use Google Analytics to measure how you use the website so it can be improved based on user needs. Atkin Chambers do not allow Google to use or share the data about how you use this site.
Google Analytics sets cookies that store anonymised information about:
how you got to the site
the pages you visit on atkinchambers.com, and how long you spend on each page
what you click on while you’re visiting the site
Strictly necessary cookies
These essential cookies do things like remember your progress through a form (for example if you register for updates). They always need to be on.
In his article for LexisNexis Mischa Balen explores the court’s approach to concurrent delay in Saga Cruises BDF Ltd v Fincantieri SpA [2016] EWHC 1875 (Comm), 167 ConLR 29.
In his view, the decision sees the application of the orthodox rules of causation, and there is an important distinction between one-off and continuing events.
