In this article published in the May 2017 edition of Construction Law, Darryl Royce considers the decision in the Technology and Construction Court of Lulu Construction Ltd v Mulalley & Co Ltd [2016] EWHC 1852 (TCC), and says the position relating to debt recovery costs in adjudication remains unclear despite a court ruling that many seem to think has brought clarity.
To read the full article click here.
David Streatfeild-James KC and Mathias Cheung acted successfully for the Claimant in Mace Construct Ltd v…
In this webinar, Mathias Cheung presents a round-up of the key cases and developments from the…
For more information please contact our clerks on
+44 (0)20 7404 0102 or clerks@atkinchambers.com
