In this article published in the May 2017 edition of Construction Law, Darryl Royce considers the decision in the Technology and Construction Court of Lulu Construction Ltd v Mulalley & Co Ltd [2016] EWHC 1852 (TCC), and says the position relating to debt recovery costs in adjudication remains unclear despite a court ruling that many seem to think has brought clarity.
To read the full article click here.
High Court awards £119m in termination costs, delay damages and defect rectification costs to owner…
Atkin Chambers’ Dominique Rawley KC, Mathias Cheung and Olivia Anderson will be presenting a construction law update in…
For more information please contact our clerks on
+44 (0)20 7404 0102 or clerks@atkinchambers.com
