In this article published in the May 2017 edition of Construction Law, Darryl Royce considers the decision in the Technology and Construction Court of Lulu Construction Ltd v Mulalley & Co Ltd [2016] EWHC 1852 (TCC), and says the position relating to debt recovery costs in adjudication remains unclear despite a court ruling that many seem to think has brought clarity.
To read the full article click here.
Mathias Cheung acted for the Claimant and Max Twivy acted for the Defendant in Paragon…
On 9th January 2026, Building Magazine published Rupert Choat KC’s annual review of construction law…
For more information please contact our clerks on
+44 (0)20 7404 0102 or clerks@atkinchambers.com
