Cookie consent

This website uses cookies to collect information about how you use this website. Atkin Chambers uses this information to make the website work as well as possible and improve the services provided by members and staff. You may choose to accept all cookies or chose to manage your cookie settings here:

Cookies on atkinchambers.com

Cookies are files saved on your phone, tablet or computer when you visit a website.

Atkin Chambers uses this information to make the website work as well as possible and improve the services provided by members and staff. You may choose to accept all cookies or chose to manage your cookie settings here:

Cookie settings

Atkin Chambers Limited use two types of cookie files, analytical cookies and necessary cookies. You can choose which cookies you are happy for us to use.

Analytical cookies that measure website use

Atkin Chambers Limited use Google Analytics to measure how you use the website so it can be improved based on user needs. Atkin Chambers do not allow Google to use or share the data about how you use this site.

Google Analytics sets cookies that store anonymised information about:

  • how you got to the site
  • the pages you visit on atkinchambers.com, and how long you spend on each page
  • what you click on while you’re visiting the site

Strictly necessary cookies

These essential cookies do things like remember your progress through a form (for example if you register for updates). They always need to be on.

Save changes

Borough of Milton Keynes v Viridor (Community Recycling MK) Ltd (No 2) [2017] EWHC 239 (TCC)

2nd Feb 2017

Rectification of a contract, either on the basis of common mistake or, alternatively, on the basis of unilateral mistake, was appropriate where payment terms offered in a tender had been unequivocally accepted but the wrong tender document had mistakenly been incorporated into the contract.

A local authority issued proceedings against a company claiming rectification of a contract on the grounds of common or unilateral mistake. The contract, dated 1 October 2009, concerned the carrying out of waste-recycling using the local authority’s existing facility, for which the company was to make an annual fixed payment.

The wrong document was included in the final formal contract, which differed from the documents in the accepted tender.  Coulson J. decided that the local authority’s acceptance of a tender through the formal EU procurement process was a pre-existing agreement by reference to which the final formal contract could be rectified to include the documents from the accepted tender.

Instructed by Anthony Collins Solicitors

Related barristers: Robert Clay

To view the full judgment please click here

22 February 2017





Register for updates

To keep in touch with news and updates from Atkin Chambers:

 

Register