Cookie consent

This website uses cookies to collect information about how you use this website. Atkin Chambers uses this information to make the website work as well as possible and improve the services provided by members and staff. You may choose to accept all cookies or chose to manage your cookie settings here:

Cookies on atkinchambers.com

Cookies are files saved on your phone, tablet or computer when you visit a website.

Atkin Chambers uses this information to make the website work as well as possible and improve the services provided by members and staff. You may choose to accept all cookies or chose to manage your cookie settings here:

Cookie settings

Atkin Chambers Limited use two types of cookie files, analytical cookies and necessary cookies. You can choose which cookies you are happy for us to use.

Analytical cookies that measure website use

Atkin Chambers Limited use Google Analytics to measure how you use the website so it can be improved based on user needs. Atkin Chambers do not allow Google to use or share the data about how you use this site.

Google Analytics sets cookies that store anonymised information about:

  • how you got to the site
  • the pages you visit on atkinchambers.com, and how long you spend on each page
  • what you click on while you’re visiting the site

Strictly necessary cookies

These essential cookies do things like remember your progress through a form (for example if you register for updates). They always need to be on.

Save changes

A Global View – Examining the issue of ‘total cost’ or ‘global’ claims

10th Jun 2016

Sir Robert Akenhead with assistance from Omar Eljadi contributed to the most recent edition of Building Magazine in which they discussed the case of John Sisk & Son Ltd vs Carmel Building Services [2016] in which the issue of ‘total costs’ or ‘global’ claims was examined. The case revisits the principle in Walter Lilly & Company Ltd v Mackay, namely that a party seeking to prove total or global costs carries a greater burden than those seeking to prove the same claim on an itemised basis. The article also looks at the benefit of the application of the Late Payment of Commercial Debts (Interest) Act 1998 to JCT conditions.

This article was first published in Building Magazine.

To read the full article, please click here.





Register for updates

To keep in touch with news and updates from Atkin Chambers:

 

Register